“They” don’t work well with structure, after all

This week, I had the displeasure of being in a conversation with someone who (unwittingly, obliviously) offended me as a Jamaican.

He was saying that the work of standardising Patwa is good for the morale of the Jamaican people. He called this standardisation process “creating a language out of it.” As if that wouldn’t cause my eyebrows to raise or furrow itself, he then went on to say that standardisation might only go so far with ‘them’. Why, you ask? Because the reason they love Patwa so much is that they can make up whatever they want and say it. They don’t do well with structure.

Um, excuse me? Please get off your high horse enough to realise that just because I was speaking English with you doesn’t mean that I do not identify with Jamaican people and with Jamaican Creole. It is a language, with rules and structure. The creation of new words (for example, the less-than-a-decade old [I think] verb ‘bil’, meaning to ‘chill’, ‘relax’, ‘calm down’) is a part of language evolution and is most certainly present in English. (American pop culture has, for example, a tendency to create portmanteaus.)

I wish it had been in a situation in which I could have responded. Don’t worry. I’d have been nice.

This entry was posted in Patwa. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to “They” don’t work well with structure, after all

  1. read.robin says:

    And why couldn’t you have responded?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s